news  articles  all Вход Регистрация
rus на русском ქართულად
Friday, 19 March 2010

Interview
  • South Ossetia: facing a revolution? 2010-03-19 09:52
  • Is the grandmaster going to play into Saakashvili’s hands? 2010-03-16 22:27
  • Have the “black” political strategists failed? 2010-03-16 09:39
  • Tusk-like hopes 2010-03-15 09:59 One of these days, Prime Minister of Poland Donald Tusk has visited Georgia. He discussed the issues of cooperation of the two countries in the fields of economy, energy, transport and tourism with the republican government. GeorgiaTimes correspondent has discussed the common points between Tbilisi and Warsaw, as well as the prospects of the Georgian-Polish dialogue, with the Russian and Georgian political analysts.
  • A drugs PR-test 2010-03-11 22:36 The Georgian government is going to pass a drugs test at the suggestion of the parliamentary opposition. President Mikhail Saakashvili expressed his readiness to be the first to submit to a hair test, just like in the times when he was Minister of Justice. The humiliating and extravagant way to show that the leader of the country is concerned about the social problem was commented upon by the Georgian and Russian experts.
  • Brothers-in-arms no more? 2010-03-10 22:59 It looks like the epoch of solid friendship between Tbilisi and Kiev is drawing to an end. Ukraine’s new president Viktor Yanukovich is expected to change the anti-Russian policies the republic has been pursuing with Yushenko. Ukraine-Georgia cool-down will most severely reflect on defense cooperation between the countries. Media have got hold of the information that the post of Ukrspetsexport CEO in charge of arms supply to Tbilisi can be offered to Valery Konovalyuk, a member of the Party of Regions, one of the toughest critics of military aid to Saakashvili regime.
Opinions

Russia’s winnings and losings

2009-02-11 14:32

It has been half a year since the end of the August war that keeps being an inexhaustible source of judgments and conclusions which are very different: from emphatically personal to claiming to be ultimate truth. Our today's publication is in no way the latter. On the contrary, the author, a well-known journalist Valery Kadzhaya, is not trying to impose his opinion. He brings forward the arguments that as he believes are transparent. Tomorrow we will present the position of his opponent who has its own arguments and understanding of the causes and consequences of the war.

The fact that the USA took interest in Georgia following the collapse of the USSR does not necessarily mean that this republic was really greatly different from other fourteen. With the sleeves rolled up the USA immediately started laying hands on them and the Warsaw treaty states with all these countries having a passionate desire to be embraced by Uncle Sam.

The Baltic states even managed to join NATO which is Georgia's dream. In fact, this striving was the main reason of aggravation of Georgia-Russia relations that finally became one of the causes of the August war.

The Russian army achieved an overwhelming victory while the Russian political leaders found themselves in quite a complicated situation. Regarding the recognition of Abkhazia's and South Ossetia's independence Russia turned out completely isolated by its partners from the West and even the CIS.

I can't make sense why there is so much partiality towards Georgia. The accession of Baltic states to NATO was taken rather calmly omitting the State Duma's and Foreign Ministry's resentment though both facts are senseless whistles. But if we reflect on it, Russian security is more threatened by the Balts' membership in the North Atlantic Alliance: it is absolutely clear that Vilnius, Riga or especially Tallinn are very close to Saint-Petersburg or Moscow.

As for Georgia, it lost any strategic meaning for Russia following the USSR breakup. It is obvious that in the Soviet times Georgia was a key to all South Caucasus and a base opening a gateway to Front Asia. But South Caucasus dropped out of Russia, and in the near future it will not be able to get it back any way.

Georgia's second role has no more significance either - it used to be an antimissile shield defending the USSR central regions from Turkey, a NATO member. Turkey was and remains Russia's potential opponent and the US and NATO bases in its territory are a threat first of all to the USSR successor, and not to Iran or Iraq.

So was the game worth the candle? What have we won and what have we lost in this short victorious war against tiny Georgia?

Print versionPrint version

1
 2 3

Add: memori.ru vaau.ru news2.ru myweb2.search.yahoo.com slashdot.org technorati.com Magnolia Livejournal Reddit Google
Permanent link :
Copy to blog
Copy to clipboard
Рейтинг@Mail.ru
Rambler's Top100